🔧 We’re rolling out major upgrades to make your saved work even safer. Everything is saving as normal — please carry on as usual. education@imageft.ie

Image Fitness Training Global

S&C Tutor Feedback — Tutor Feedback

Sean Reilly — Practical Assessment (Merit, 83.5%)

Submitted by Sean Reilly 14 Jun 2026, 10:54 · 528 words Reference IFT-SNC-FEED-2026-06-14-8DCP

Student Details

Name
Sean Reilly
Course Location
Swords
Course Group
S&C Summer 26
Course Start
2026-06-14

Practical Assessment Result

Automatically calculated from the rubric grades · 29 of 29 criteria graded

Merit REPs Ireland & PD Approval: Competent
83.5%

Final weighted score

ComponentEarned%WeightContributes
Exercise Demo & Technical Coaching 18 / 21 85.7% 25% 21.4%
Fault Identification & Correction 13 / 18 72.2% 15% 10.8%
Session Delivery & Coaching Practice 28 / 33 84.8% 40% 33.9%
Professional Scenario / Viva 13 / 15 86.7% 20% 17.3%
Assessor
Mark White
Assessment date
2026-06-14

Student & Assessment Details19 words

Student full name: Sean Reilly

Student email: seanreilly24@gmail.com

Assessment date: 2026-06-14

Course group: S&C Summer 26

Course location: Swords

Assessor4 words

Assessor name: Mark White

Component 1 — Exercise Demonstration & Technical Coaching97 words

• Technical execution — Competent (Pass) [C]
Notes: Good observations, good knowledge feedback
• Load selection — Competent (Pass) [C]
• Instructional clarity — Highly Competent [HC]
Notes: Well controlled and feedback on stages through out
• Coaching cues — Highly Competent [HC]
Notes: Good visual and verbal communication and feedback
• Demonstration quality — Highly Competent [HC]
Notes: Good and understands the impact on the body
• Observation & feedback — Highly Competent [HC]
Notes: very good at reinforcing positive feedback
• Safety awareness — Competent (Pass) [C]
Notes: Needs to talk about the possible risks

Exercises observed (up to 5)3 words

Exercise 1: Plyometrics

Component 2 — Fault Identification & Correction110 words

• Fault identification — Competent (Pass) [C]
Notes: Needs to talk about landing mechanics
• Problem recognition — Competent (Pass) [C]
Notes: Understood maybe a strength issue but needed to be pushed on landing mechanics
• Cause analysis — Competent (Pass) [C]
Notes: Good on muscles to be strengthened
• Corrective coaching — Competent (Pass) [C]
Notes: Good on why this is relevant to the sport and designed specific drills for this multidirectional sport
• Regression / progression — Competent (Pass) [C]
Notes: Good at regressing from plyometrics to jumping and landing with out speed
• Safety prioritisation — Highly Competent [HC]
Notes: Good observation and allowed for possible faults

Component 3 — Session Delivery & Coaching Practice180 words

• Session planning & organisation — Competent (Pass) [C]
Notes: Logical and flowed for the athlete
• Professional conduct — Highly Competent [HC]
Notes: Very professional throughout
• Warm-up delivery — Competent (Pass) [C]
Notes: RAMP protocol structured, raise, mobility/activation, pro
• Technical instruction — Highly Competent [HC]
Notes: Good easy to understand cues with good demonstrations and feed back
• Demonstration quality — Highly Competent [HC]
Notes: good with good cues
• Observation & feedback — Competent (Pass) [C]
Notes: Good observation from different angles, neds a little more correction
• Safety management — Competent (Pass) [C]
Notes: All set up well and safe space, needs to understand the importance of a longer rest to allow the athlete perform to their best in each set
• Session management — Highly Competent [HC]
Notes: All planned and controlled well
• Adaptability — Competent (Pass) [C]
Notes: Nees a little more feedback from client
• Communication & engagement — Highly Competent [HC]
Notes: motivating and positive
• Cool-down & conclusion — Highly Competent [HC]
Notes: Good cool down with good knowledge

Component 4 — Professional Scenario Questions / Viva63 words

• Problem analysis — Highly Competent [HC]
Notes: Understood the problem of contact time being to fast and adapted
• Evidence-based reasoning — Highly Competent [HC]
• Professional judgment — Competent (Pass) [C]
Notes: Good reasoning throughout
• Practical solutions — Competent (Pass) [C]
Notes: Good solutions to progressing the athlete
• Communication — Highly Competent [HC]
Notes: Clear and showed good understanding

Assessor feedback to student44 words

Assessor comments / feedback to student: Good well planned session, showed good knowledge through out. Needs a little work on understanding how to regress to better landing mechanics if client is struggling. Needs to talk a little about the amount of load. Very competent

Sign-off8 words

Assessor signature (type name): Mark White

Date: 2026-06-14

← BackDrive backup ↗