S&C Tutor Feedback — Tutor Feedback

Student full name: Danielle Byrne

Student email: healthandwealth@outlook.com

Student ID (optional): gg

Assessment date: 2026-06-13

Course group: S&C Summer Swords

Course location: Swords

Assessor name: Tutor

• Technical execution — Competent (Pass) [C]
Notes: Agility for Garlic football Good observation and cues through out, good corrections on movements such as not dragging training foot.
• Load selection — Competent (Pass) [C]
Notes: Good use of RAMP warm up
• Instructional clarity — Highly Competent [HC]
Notes: Good cues trhough out not over coached and good positive messages through out
• Coaching cues — Competent (Pass) [C]
Notes: Good cues through out
• Demonstration quality — Competent (Pass) [C]
Notes: Good demonstration and gives possible errors when doing the movements during the demo.
• Observation & feedback — Highly Competent [HC]
Notes: Very involved in session with good cues and different angles of observation
• Safety awareness — Highly Competent [HC]
Notes: Very aware of space and the athletes ability.

Exercise 1: Warm up, Change of direction and agility session

• Fault identification — Competent (Pass) [C]
Notes: One side is weaker and less stable on the plant and push off when turning, good reasoning on the fault and possible tests to do before putting a correction program in place.
• Problem recognition — Competent (Pass) [C]
Notes: Good feedback of the importance of the movements for the game, good feedback on the possible errors in during the drills, good patience on feedback.
• Cause analysis — Competent (Pass) [C]
Notes: Good understating that the cause maybe lack of strength or stability the left leg
• Corrective coaching — Competent (Pass) [C]
Notes: Good cues, maybe a little to fat to give correction and not allowing the athlete get a feel for the movement. Good advice on developing a program that involve uni lateral exercise for the legs the insure both limbs and improving in strength and stability.
• Regression / progression — Highly Competent [HC]
Notes: Good understanding of the need not to favour the strong side, designing drills to allow the athlete not dominate on the strong side.
• Safety prioritisation — Highly Competent [HC]
Notes: Good

• Session planning & organisation — Highly Competent [HC]
Notes: Well planned out and flowed very well. Made the session specific to the movements needs of the sport, also, allowed for the skills of the game such as high catch and burst forward.
• Professional conduct — Highly Competent [HC]
Notes: Very professional through out
• Warm-up delivery — Competent (Pass) [C]
Notes: Jog to RAISE body temp, Slow change of direction in Raise good for going over movement needs and movement skills of the game. Good specific mobility exercise, Needs to add a little more activation exercise to prime specific muscles for the agility session. A little to quick to full sprints
• Technical instruction — Competent (Pass) [C]
Notes: Good simple cues open to feedback and understands the difference between COD and agility and good build up. Good understanding on the need of deceleration drills in field sports.
• Demonstration quality — Highly Competent [HC]
Notes: Good drills and good direction and easy to understand cues
• Observation & feedback — Highly Competent [HC]
Notes: Good feedback, good demonstration open to feedback with appropriate answers.
• Safety management — Highly Competent [HC]
Notes: Good spotting, space awareness and asking for feedback from the athlete
• Session management — Competent (Pass) [C]
Notes: Good flow and safe throughout and looking for feedback from the athlete
• Adaptability — Competent (Pass) [C]
Notes: Good on adaptability, good on understanding the importance of recovery to help the athlete achieve the set goal of improving agility
• Communication & engagement — Highly Competent [HC]
Notes: Very engaging and motivating. Positive feedback and understanding the athlete may need practise to improve movement quality
• Cool-down & conclusion — Highly Competent [HC]
Notes: Good cool down and stretches

• Problem analysis — Highly Competent [HC]
Notes: Working with a team of kids at different stages of development. Good understanding of different levels of physical and emotional development
• Evidence-based reasoning — Competent (Pass) [C]
Notes: Good feedback on how to work with different levels of kids
• Professional judgment — Highly Competent [HC]
Notes: Good practise on team practise not singling out less developed kids. regressing the whole session but adding a extra edge or challenge to keep interest
• Practical solutions — Competent (Pass) [C]
Notes: Good on regressions for the agility session for kids of different abilitys.
• Communication — Competent (Pass) [C]
Notes: Good communication and positive feedback Maybe a little rushed.

Component(s) referred (if applicable): Good cues and understanding of agility and change of direction. Slow down a little bit on feedback

Assessor comments / feedback to student: Very well thought out session that flowed very well and good feedback through out with good answers for all questions. Good understanding of required movements and skills.

Assessor signature (type name): Mark White

Date: 2026-06-13

Internal Verifier signature (if reviewed): gg

IV date: 2026-06-12